Dichotomous Thinking And Authoritarian Personality

Either you do what I say or you are against me. What I say and think is the only truth, the rest are falsehoods or nonsense. This type of reasoning defines the authoritarian person, the one whose thinking is always as dichotomous as it is rigid.
Dichotomous thinking and the authoritarian personality

Dichotomous thinking defines those people who build their reality based on categories. For them everything is black or white, good or bad, or you are by their side or you are against them. This tendency to evaluate what surrounds them based on such extreme or polarized concepts very often defines a clearly authoritarian profile with which it is very difficult to live.

Absolute terms are not as abundant as we think of in our social universe. This is something we must understand first. That is, experience always ends up showing us that absolute happiness, for example, is not possible. Also that the human being is never completely good or totally evil. Our reality is changing, complex, it is full of nuances, and being able to accept all that variability is key to well-being and intelligence.

However, there are those who insist that everything that surrounds them conforms to a rigid and stable scheme, to a pattern that is as simple as possible so that everything is under control. What’s more, as an old Serbian proverb jokes, there are two types of people in this world, those who believe that there are two types of people and those who do not. Beyond the ironic (and correct) of this idea, there is a rather serious aspect.

This dichotomous approach is the origin of many prejudices, of those biases that build the most harmful stereotypes. This is something that psychologists Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer already told us about in their day. Now, there is a fact that is worth reflecting on: dichotomous thinking is fought by encouraging critical and flexible thinking. Something that, sadly, is not always applied in schools or taught at home.

Trees shaped like heads of people representing dichotomous thinking

Dichotomous thinking and the primitive mind

Dichotomous or black-and-white thinking is harmful and should be out of date. It is the glimpse of a past where invented and clearly biased dichotomies abounded in excess (some races superior to others, one gender stronger than another, etc.). Now, something that they point out to us from the field of social psychology is that this type of cognitive approach occurs much more than we think.

Some may be surprised, but in a way, thinking in absolute terms is much easier. The reason? It does not require effort and this means that quite a few people apply this scheme of thought without realizing it. They do it when they see things in terms of good or bad, of right or wrong, without appreciating the nuances in between, those that, often, with a little more detail and empathy, allow us to see a broader and richer reality.

It should be noted that psychologists such as Aaron T. Beck defined this type of reasoning as ‘primitive and immature thinking’ as early as the 1960s. Thus, according to the father of cognitive therapy, who thinks in absolute terms and applies this type of bias, is characterized by making use of a type of very rigid mental processes. They are as follows:

  • They only look at the global aspects of reality. They are not able to analyze and conceptualize certain information in scales, degrees or dimensions.
  • His thought is also invariable and irreversible.
Manager yelling at his employees

Dichotomous thinking and authoritarianism

Aaron T. Beck also indicated at the time that this type of mental approach is not, by itself, indicative of any mental disorder. However, sometimes other symptoms are added to dichotomous thinking to shape clinical conditions such as borderline personality disorder.

On the other hand, where it is usually present is in authoritarian behavior. Today we even have a scale to measure dichotomous thinking, and it is through studies such as the one carried out by Dr. Atkushi Oshio, from the University of Tokyo, where we discover the intimate relationship between authoritarianism and ‘ thinking in black and white ‘.

  • According to this work, dichotomous thinking is common in narcissistic people with low self-esteem, who also present an authoritarian behavior.
  • They are people who do not tolerate ambiguity, who need to have everything under control and who tend to devalue anyone who thinks opposite to them.
  • Also, another factor that usually appears in this type of personality is perfectionism.

The need to train our cognitive flexibility

To reverse dichotomous thinking, we must promote cognitive flexibility from a very early age. This executive function would allow us, among other things, to have a greater ability to solve problems. After all, something that the rigid and authoritarian personality does not accept is the contradiction. However, if there is something that abounds in our daily reality, it is complexity and variability.

Lightbulb shaped like a human head representing dichotomous thinking

Being able, therefore, to assume that wealth of stimuli and categories from a more open, respectful and flexible point of view, would enrich us much more as human beings. Taking other points of view into account is synonymous with empathy and intelligence. In addition, flexible thinking, as opposed to dichotomous and rigid, shapes a lifestyle where we adapt much better to the complexities of our environment.

We will feel less frustrations, we will be more creative, tolerant and prepared to analyze, value and connect much better with everything that surrounds us. Let us therefore try to apply this approach on a day-to-day basis and fight those authoritarian looks determined to create a world to suit you.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Back to top button